ABSTRACT
Background: A three-fold increase in the incidence of detecting pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia compared with that in the general population was recently reported; however, this finding may be due to admission bias in the diagnostic investigation. The current cohort study aimed to estimate the risk of having detectable active PTB after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: Insurance claims data in lower Southern Thailand from the 12th regional National Health Security Office, Thailand, were used. Inpatient and outpatient electronic medical records were linked using encrypted identification numbers. Records of individuals aged ≥18 years from 1 April to 30 September 2021 were retrieved to form a dynamic cohort. Exposure status was based on SARS-CoV-2 investigation and pneumonia status: population control (general population who had never been tested), negative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) control, asymptomatic COVID-19, symptomatic COVID-19 without pneumonia, and COVID-19 pneumonia groups. They were tracked in the databases for subsequent bacteriologically confirmed PTB until 31 March 2022. Findings: Overall, 4,241,201 individuals were recruited in the dynamic cohort and contributed 3,108,224, 227,918, 34,251, 10,325, and 14,160 person-years in the above exposure groups, respectively. Time-varying Cox's regression was conducted using population control as reference. Hazard ratios (95% CIs) of the negative control, asymptomatic, symptomatic COVID-19 without pneumonia, and pneumonia groups were 1.58 (1.08, 2.32), 1.00 (0.25, 4.01), 2.98 (0.74, 11.98), 9.87 (5.64, 17.30) in the first 30 days and 0.97 (0.81, 1.15), 1.41 (0.92, 2.17), 3.85 (2.42, 6.13), and 7.15 (5.54, 9.22) thereafter, respectively. Interpretation: Having had COVID-19 pneumonia, as opposed to the general population status, was strongly associated with a higher hazard of detectable active PTB. In tuberculosis endemic areas, patients with COVID-19 pneumonia should be closely followed up to reduce PTB-related burden. Funding: The Fogarty International Center and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health supported the article processing charges under Award Number D43TW009522.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The health care system in Thailand has struggled to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in decreased administration of community-based directly observed therapy (DOT) for tuberculosis (TB). As an alternative to failed DOT, video-observed therapy (VOT) or the Thai asynchronous VOT system, "TH VOT," was devised. We developed a protocol for a study to test the superiority of VOT over DOT in ensuring treatment compliance. OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare the mean cumulative compliance days of TB patients and their observers under the VOT program with that of individuals under the DOT program during the intensive phase of TB treatment. METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled trial of pulmonary TB patients and their observers will be conducted over a 2-month period. This study will be conducted in the Hat Yai and Meuang Songkhla districts of Songkhla Province, Southern Thailand. A total of 38 observers working at 38 primary care units (PCUs) will be randomized equally into VOT and DOT groups. The TH VOT system will be implemented in 19 PCUs in the VOT group while the other 19 PCUs will continue with the traditional DOT program. Approximately 1-5 TB patients will be under observation, depending on the PCU jurisdiction in which the patients reside. The inclusion criteria for TB patients will be as follows: patients diagnosed with newly active pulmonary TB with a positive acid-fast bacilli sputum smear, aged >18 years, own a smartphone, and are able to use the LINE (Line Corporation) app. The exclusion criteria will be patients with a condition that requires the intervention of a specialist, rifampicin resistance according to a cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test (GeneXpert MTB/RIF), unable to continue the treatment, and/or alcohol dependence. After the 2-month observation period, all sessions and follow-up clinical outcomes recorded will be retrieved. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed to assess the compliance of both patients undergoing drug administration and their observers. RESULTS: The Human Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University approved the trial on February 19, 2021 (approval number 64-03618-9). The trial was funded in May 2021. The recruitment period will be from January 2022 to July 2022. The observation is scheduled to end by September 2022. CONCLUSIONS: If the VOT shows superiority in observational compliance among patients and observers, the existing DOT policy will be replaced with VOT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20210624002; https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20210624002. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/38796.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Thailand, the health care system has struggled to cope with COVID-19, resulting in directly observed therapy for tuberculosis being de-emphasized. A video-observed therapy (VOT) system, or more specifically, the Thai VOT (TH VOT) system, was developed to replace directly observed therapy. According to the pilot study, the system needed notifications to improve usability and user compliance. The updated version of the TH VOT system thus enabled LINE (Line Corporation) notifications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to reassess users' compliance with and the usability of the updated TH VOT system. METHODS: This study was conducted in the Hat Yai and Mueang Songkhla districts in Songkhla Province, Southern Thailand, from September 18 to December 1, 2021. The system was used by not only patients with tuberculosis but also tuberculosis staff, who acted as observers in primary health care settings. Some of the observers used the simulated VOT system instead of the actual system due to the lack of participating patients in their jurisdiction. After 30 days of using the system, VOT session records were analyzed to determine the compliance of the patients and observers. The User Experience Questionnaire was administered to reassess the usability of the system and compare the ratings of the participants with the general benchmark scores of the User Experience Questionnaire. The results were summarized to reveal the degree of user compliance and usability in the following three groups: the patients, actual VOT observers, and simulated VOT observers. RESULTS: Of the 19 observers, 10 used the actual VOT system, and the remaining 9 used the simulated VOT system; there were also 10 patients with tuberculosis. The patients, actual VOT observers, and simulated VOT observers exhibited about 70%, 65%, and 50% compliance, respectively, in terms of following the standard operating procedures every day. The scores of all groups on all dimensions were well above the average scores. There was no significant difference in any of the dimensional scores among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The updated version of the TH VOT system was deemed usable by both the patients and the health care staff. Compliance with the use of the system was high among the patients but moderate among the observers.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Directly observed therapy programs for monitoring tuberculosis (TB) treatment in Thailand are unsustainable, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. The current video-observed therapy (VOT) system, the Thai VOT (TH VOT), was developed to replace the directly observed therapy program. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the VOT system design and identify the potential for system improvements. METHODS: This pilot study was conducted in Na Yong district, a small district in Trang province, south of Thailand. The TH VOT system consists of a smartphone app for patients, a secured web-based platform for staff, items used, and standard operating procedures. There were three groups of users: observers who were TB staff, healthy volunteers as simulated patients, and patients with active TB. All participants were trained to follow the standard operating procedures. After 2-week usage, VOT session records were analyzed to measure the compliance of the patients and observers. The User Experience Questionnaire was used to lead the participant users to focus on 6 standard dimensions of usability, and was supplemented with an in-depth interview to identify potential system improvements from users' experience. RESULTS: Only 2 of 16 patients with currently active TB had a usable smartphone. Sixty of 70 drug-taking sessions among 2 patients and 3 simulated patients in 2 weeks were recorded and uploaded. Only 37 sessions were inspected by the observers within 24 hours. All participants needed a proper notification system. An audit system was also requested. CONCLUSIONS: Before upscaling, the cost of smartphone lending, audit management, and notification systems should be elucidated.